The Problem With Darwin-ism?

I'm going to point you to an interesting paper which exams Darwin-ism. Not just problems with the fact that the mechanisms which Darwin identified need to be constantly challenged and researched -- science is not static-- but with what the authors talk about as the 'dangers inherent in ideology-based thinking'.

They wrote:

In conclusion: Darwinism had all prerequisites for constructing an ideology because it merged out-of-date ideas into a picture of Nature which is, in fact, much more divergent and built even by adverse structures.

Because of the dangers inherent in ideologicall-based thinking, this could create some kind of contiguous conception with many consequences.

And so Darwin and his thoughts should be discussed constatnly in the future and should probably be revised in many aspects.

By Jorn greve and Gerhard Neuhauser of Justus-Liefig University, Giessen, Germany.



This is a pdf version of the Pleistocene Coalition News.